The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and the National Socialists (Nazis)

 by Michael Applebaum, MD, JD, FCLM

This rant is not as light as some others. It is a bit more serious.

Godwin's Law states, "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." (For a more complete discussion, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law )

The longer the discussion, the older it is.

The NEJM did not take long to compare the sick care workers at Abu Ghraib to the Nazis.

Perhaps this is NEJM's nod to anti-aging medicine.

NEJM has had to admit to publishing some bad information. For examples, see:

http://www.healthwatch-uk.org/awardwinners/peterwilmshurst.html,

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/NEJMe068020,

http://www.lawsuitsearch.com/news/drugs/Medical_Journal_Corrects_Vioxx_Article.aspx and

http://www.hon.ch/News/HSN/535854.html

NEJM, perhaps a bit self-righteously, was quick to condemn the sick care workers as Nazis. Whether their behavior is worthy of that comparison is debatable.

But when NEJM had a chance to really "expose" sick care at its World War II best, it lost courage.

It is apparently tougher for NEJM to do something to help people (i.e., patients) than it is to engage in name-calling.

Then again, who really suffers when bad medical treatment is administered? Why the patients, of course.

And who benefits? Why the medical profession, of course. It gets paid to create the problem and then administer the new therapy in an attempt to fix the problem it caused in the first place.

Perhaps NEJM is just being a good servant of the profession.

The following text was submitted to the NEJM for publication. They chose not to publish it. Another bad decision, in my humble opinion.

 

In the July 29, 2004 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, [i] psychiatrist Robert Lifton, suggestively placed the behavior of physicians at Abu Ghraib on a continuum in direct line with the Nazis who, “In addition to cruel medical experiments, many Nazi doctors, as part of military units, were directly involved in killing.” [ii]

This is a decidedly weak comparison.

When all is said and done, the number of sick care workers implicated at Abu Ghraib is likely to be small. In contrast, the Nazi killing machine was of substantial size, since, according to Dr. Lifton and NEJM, “many Nazi doctors…were directly involved in killing.” Also the quantity of those affected at Abu Ghraib was relatively small compared to the victims of the Nazi physicians. [iii]

Such an anemic comparison does not begin to approximate the true magnitude of harm that can be caused when a systemic policy emulates Nazi conduct. [iv]

If Dr. Lifton and NEJM feel a need to draw comparisons between the behavior of “many” involved in sick care and the Nazis, a much better place to look may be the weight loss advice the sick care industry provides to the public. [v]

“Killing” is defined as:

To deprive of life

Intended or apt to kill; fatal. [vi]

Thus, it can be reasonably inferred that shortening life or placing one in a position where life can be shortened is a form of “killing.”

Does Obesity or Overweight Kill?

If we believe what the sick care industry says, the answer has to be a definite “yes.”

These conditions [vii] which can result in morbidity, mortality and diminished quality of life are associated with overweight/obesity:

Diabetes

Cancer

Heart failure

Angina pectoris

Myocardial infarction

Coronary heart disease

Stroke [viii]

The Recommendations Of The Sick Care Industry

The sick care industry recommends weight loss for the overweight or obese.

Illustrative of what the sick care industry prescribes to the public, i.e., patients, de jure or de facto, as to the proper dietary intake for successful weight loss are the following:

This is from the Mayo Clinic: [ix]

To lose weight, talk to your doctor about setting these daily calorie (sic) goals:

Your weight in pounds

Daily calorie (sic) goal

Women

Men

250 or less

1,200

1,400

251 to 300

1,400

1,600

301 or more

1,600

1,800

This is from David L. Katz, MD [x] and Jorge Cruise: [xi]

Weight in Pounds [xii]

Daily Caloric Goal - Men and Women

199

1,450

200 to 249

1,650

250 to 299

1,850

300 or more

2,050

This is from Harvard and eDiets [xiii]:

Counting Calories: Doing the Math

…Let’s say you’re a woman who is 5 feet, 2 inches tall and weighs 150 pounds, and you need to lose about 15 pounds to put you in a healthy weight range. If you multiply 150 by 15, you will get 2,250, which is the number of calories (sic) per day that you need in order to maintain your current weight (weight-maintenance calories (sic)). To lose weight, you will need to get below that total. For example, to lose one to two pounds a week—a rate that experts consider safe—your food consumption should provide 500–1,000 calories (sic) less than your total weight-maintenance calories (sic). If you need 2,250 calories (sic) a day to maintain your current weight, reduce your daily calories (sic) to 1,250–1,750. If you are sedentary, you will also need to build more activity into your day. In order to lose at least a pound a week, try to do at least 30 minutes of physical activity on most days, and reduce your daily calorie (sic) intake by at least 500 calories (sic). [xiv]

If we assume that recommended activity burns 300 Calories/day, we end up with the following daily Calorie intakes to sustain the body:

Mayo:

Your weight in pounds

Daily calorie (sic) goal

Women

Men

250 or less

900

1,100

251 to 300

1,100

1,300

301 or more

1,300

1,500

Katz and Cruise:

Weight in Pounds

Daily Caloric Goal - Men and Women

199

1,150

200 to 249

1,350

250 to 299

1,550

300 or more

1,750

Harvard and eDiets (150 pound woman example): 950–1,450 Calories.

How do these numbers compare to Dr. Lifton’s and NEJM’s Nazis?

In September, 1944, the internees at Dachau were fed 1,071 Calories daily. [xv] This is almost 20% more Calories than Mayo, Harvard and eDiets recommend for some women, about the same as Mayo recommends for some men and merely 7% less than Katz and Cruise recommend for men and women up to 200 pounds. [xvi]

And these expert diet representatives of the sick care industry expect people to eat this way voluntarily.

Fat chance.

Because the sick care establishment cannot forcibly ensure compliance with its Draconian, industry-wide Dachau Diet Plan, people quit.

“[U]nder the conditions of ruthless control of Nazi occupation” the inhabitants of the Western Netherlands were brought “to a state of starvation.” [xvii] The daily caloric intake of these starving, sedentary Hollanders was a relatively generous 1529 Calories in 1944. [xviii]

When competent researchers wanted to intentionally starve people, they fed male subjects weighing an average of 152.6 pounds a “whopping” 1570 calories on average per day. [xix]

Sick care industry experts blame dieters for the failure, "’Everybody can lose weight,’ said Dr. George Blackburn, a Harvard Medical School nutrition expert familiar with the survey who also has consulted for Glaxo. If people failed in the past, ‘they didn't try long enough and effectively enough,’ he said.” [xx]

This is despite the observation that “the grumbling and grousing that are inevitably provoked when the energy intake is deficient to the extent of 15 – 20 per cent, to the apathy and dissolution of higher human qualities that come with severe starvation, there is a wide variety of psychological reactions to hunger, many of which are almost, of themselves, diagnostic of the level of calorie intake” [xxi] and the fact that some diets, e.g., the Mayo Clinic, expect dieters to reduce caloric intake by as much as 52% from the calculated BMR. [xxii] It should be remembered that BMR does not include energy spent performing activities of daily living. [xxiii] Therefore, the reduction from total daily caloric expenditure is greater – up to approximately 69%. [xxiv]

It may be of interest to note that even if dieters (understandably, wisely?) fail to engage in 300 Calories worth of daily activity, the experts’ numbers still represent inanition fare for many at a level comparable to or less than the starvation cuisine of the Western Netherlands under Nazi control. [xxv]

Some Results Of The Weight Loss Recommendations Of The Sick Care Industry

Failed dieting is not without its sequelae.

Once freed from the torture of starvation dieting, dieters tend to overeat. [xxvi]

This makes them even bigger and fatter than before.

It also maintains or increases their risk for developing the deadly conditions associated with overweight and obesity since increasing BMI is associated with increasing risk. [xxvii]

Therefore, it is no stretch to consider expert diet advice as not only the cause of diet failure, but a vehicle for killing, i.e., shortening life or placing one in a position where life can be shortened.

In other words, given the size of the sick care industry’s diet advice division(s), arguably “many…doctors are…involved in killing,” as are, arguably, other advice-givers.

Additionally, there are the concomitant suffering and diminished quality of life experienced by failed dieters who survive the diet advice of the sick care industry as they progress towards a possibly hastened death.

Failed dieting is considered among the indications for bariatric surgical intervention. [xxviii] In fact, SAGES [xxix] and ASBS [xxx] consider it a mandatory requirement. [xxxi] Bariatric surgery itself has long-term consequences, including “lifelong follow- up with nutritional counseling and biochemical surveillance.” [xxxii] Although beyond the scope of this article, an investigation into liability for “needless” surgery when impossible dieting was the treatment precedent, might be of interest. This exploration would include such discussions as whether: the prescriber of the impossible/starvation diet regimen is at fault, the surgeon may be at fault for operating on a patient who had not received appropriate pre-surgical diet advice, the institution is at fault for permitting “unnecessary” surgeries as matter of policy, etc. [xxxiii]

What To Do

Recommending what is essentially starvation dieting as the proper path to weight loss for the general public is plausibly a mistake. Such error likely contributes to diet failure and therefore continuing (and increasing) overweight/obesity and the consequential illnesses.

The severe diet approach currently recommended and described above is but one problem extant in the system. There are others. These include conflicting information, [xxxiv] failure to aggressively combat patently erroneous weight loss program claims, [xxxv] and a continued reliance on the flawed premise underlying the foundation of virtually all weight loss advice. [xxxvi]

Since there is a reasonable possibility that the diet advice of the experts from the sick care industry contributes substantially to the overweight/obesity epidemic, it is suggested that the industry reconsider its recommendations and the data underlying it.

Contemplating a moratorium on providing advice while undertaking this re-evaluation may be appropriate (and life-saving). Until such time as the system can be reviewed and corrected, it is possibly better for the sick care and weight loss industries to remain silent than to fulfill the behaviors described by Dr. Lifton and NEJM.


[i] Lifton RJ. Human Rights: Doctors and Torture. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:415-416, Jul 29, 2004

[ii] Id at 416

[iii] This does not suggest exculpation from proven wrongdoing.

[iv] There is no suggestion in this article that any of those mentioned, the sick care industry, its participants, diet gurus, or anyone else, or any business entity, either individually or collectively is/are Nazis or is/are attempting to be Nazis.

[v] In this article, sick care industry participants include: physicians and other sick care workers (e.g., nutritionists/dietitians), medical centers and academic institutions, the government and pharmaceutical companies. Others who participate in the weight loss industry, such as diet gurus, trainers, etc. are included as well.

[vi] Killing. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004 (Accessed: November 17, 2006 at http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Killing)

[vii] This list is non-exhaustive.

[viii] There are many articles and texts covering these conditions. For examples, see: Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. “Obesity as an Independent Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease: A 26-Year Follow-up of Participants in the Framingham Heart Study,” Circulation 67 (1983): 968–77; Eckel RH, Krauss RM, “American Heart Association Call to Action: Obesity as a Major Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease—AHA Nutrition Committee,” Circulation 97 (1998): 2099–100; Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al, “A Prospective Study of Obesity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women,” New England Journal of Medicine 322 (1990): 882–89; Berns MA, de Vries JH, Katan MB, “Increase in Body Fatness as a Major Determinant of Changes in Serum Total Cholesterol and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Young Men over a 10- Year Period,” American Journal of Epidemiology 130 (1989): 1109–22; Chiang BN, Perlman LV, Epstein FH, “Overweight and Hypertension: A Review,” Circulation 39 (1969): 403–21; Olshansky, SJ., Passaro DJ., Hershow RC., et al, “A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century,” New England Journal of Medicine 352 (2005): 1135–37.

[ix] Weight loss: 6 strategies for success. Make your weight-loss goals a reality. These six strategies can help. (Accessed November 17, 2006, at http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/weight-loss/HQ01625)

[x] Associate Professor Adjunct in Public Health Practice, Yale School of Public Health. “Katz has authored nearly 100 scientific papers and chapters and 10 books to date. He is a syndicated health columnist for the New York Times; nutrition columnist to “O”, The Oprah Magazine; and a medical contributor for ABC News.” (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://publichealth.yale.edu/faculty/katz.html).

[xi] Representative of “diet gurus.”

[xii] Cruise, J. The 3-Hour Diet: How Low-Carb Diets Make You Fat and Timing Makes You Thin. New York, NY: HarperCollins 2005:85. Foreword by David L. Katz, MD.

[xiii] Weigh Less, Live Longer: Strategies for Successful Weight Loss. (Accessed November 17, 2006, at http://www.ediets.com/harvard/weighless/?section=howtolose)

[xiv] The last sentence both contradicts the previous sentences and is mathematically incorrect.

[xv] Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950:1243

[xvi] Id at 1239 – 1246 for an overview of how “royally” enemies and others are fed compared to current diet recommendations.

[xvii] Malnutrition and Starvation in Western Netherlands—September 1944 to July 1945, Editorial Committee. PEDIATRICS Vol. 6 No. 5 November 1950, pp. 825 (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/6/5/825-a)

[xviii] Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950:1242. See generally, Burger GCE, Drummond JC, Sandstead HR, eds. Malnutrition and Starvation in Western Netherlands, September 1944 – July 1945. Parts I and II. General State Printing Office. The Hague, Netherlands, 1948.

[xix] Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950:1131

[xx] Dieters Prefer Own Weight Loss Plans Over Doctors' Advice (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227801,00.html?sPage=fnc.health/nutrition)

[xxi] Drummond J. Foreword in Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950:xiv

[xxii] Applebaum M. Why Diets Fail: The Simple Mistake That Ruins Millions Of Lives. Chicago, IL: FitnessMed, Inc. 2005

[xxiii] BMR is defined as, “The rate at which energy is used by an organism at complete rest, measured in humans by the heat given off per unit time, and expressed as the calories released per kilogram of body weight or per square meter of body surface per hour.” bmr. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. (Accessed: November 19, 2006 at http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bmr)

[xxiv] Applebaum M. Why Diets Fail: The Simple Mistake That Ruins Millions Of Lives. Chicago, IL: FitnessMed, Inc. 2005. The figures in this and footnote xxii are without reducing Calories to account for daily physical activity.

[xxv] Or the “sumptuous” fare offered inmates of a Parisian insane asylum by the Vichy government in April, 1941. See Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950:1241.

[xxvi] Id at 842 – 847 and 1132

[xxvii] See: Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158:1855

[xxviii] SAGES GUIDELINES FOR LAPAROSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MORBID OBESITY: This guideline was prepared jointly by SAGES and the ASBS (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.lapsurgery.com/BARIATRIC%20SURGERY/SAGES.htm)

[xxix] SAGES = Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.lapsurgery.com/BARIATRIC%20SURGERY/SAGES.htm)

[xxx] ASBS = American Society of Bariatric Surgeons (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.lapsurgery.com/BARIATRIC%20SURGERY/SAGES.htm)

[xxxi] SAGES GUIDELINES FOR LAPAROSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MORBID OBESITY: This guideline was prepared jointly by SAGES and the ASBS (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.lapsurgery.com/BARIATRIC%20SURGERY/SAGES.htm)

[xxxii] PERI-OPERATIVE AND LONG TERM MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS (Accessed November 19, 2006 at http://www.lapsurgery.com/BARIATRIC%20SURGERY/SAGES.htm)

[xxxiii] Discussion of others potentially bearing responsibility is also beyond the scope of this article.

[xxxiv] E.g., the industry clearly states that a weight loss rate of 1-2 pounds per week is considered “safe.” Yet, it fails to come out strongly in opposition to weight loss plans, such as Art Agatston’s South Beach Diet, that proudly proclaims “8 – 13 pounds lost in the first 2 weeks!” and Cruise and Katz’s 3-Hour Diet which promises, “lose up to 10 pounds in the first 2 weeks—guaranteed!” From Agatston A. The South Beach Diet: The Delicious, Doctor-Designed, Foolproof Plan for Fast and Healthy Weight Loss. Arthur Agatston, MD 2003: dust jacket back and p. 3 and How Our Diet Works. (Accessed November 18, 2006, at http://3hourdiet.com/home/index.php?page=HIW3)

[xxxv] Cruise and Katz proclaimed their 3-Hour Diet as "The Yale University endorsed 3-Hour Diet™..." Eat every three hours and you will lose weight - starting with belly fat first (Accessed August 31, 2005 at http://www.jorgecruise.com/home/index.php?page=HIW2) and AOL Coach on his new book, ‘The 3-Hour Diet.’ (Accessed November 18, 2006 at http://coaches.aol.com/diet/feature/_a/author-qanda-with-jorge-cruise/20060626125609990001). Although these individuals are associated with the assertion that their diet scheme was endorsed by Yale University, this does not appear to be the case. For further information go to: http://www.yale.edu/licensing/other.html (Accessed November 19, 2006) and http://www.drapplebaum.com/Fitness%20Rants/Index.Fitness%20Rants.htm (Accessed November 17, 2006)

[xxxvi] It is a biological, physiological. mathematical and physical impossibility to lose 1 - 2 pounds per week while in a negative caloric balance of 500 – 1000 Calories per day. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance (5th Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2001:849. As to whether weight loss at this rate is “safe,” see, generally, Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press 1950.